GMAT资讯分享

大家周三好呀!为大家带来一篇完美的GMAT写作高分作文是怎样的,希望对大家GMAT备考有所帮助。

GMAT写作  高分作文构成

首先,我们要浏览GMAT作文题目、审题(分析题目的结论、论据和假设)并写出开头段。

审题和开头段同时进行,一边看题一边写,这不是回避逻辑错误,GMAT考试而是将审题、找错和写作有机地结合。第一段的任务无非就是指出论题的结论、假设、论据,并指出题目有错误。同学们会发现,在我们写作第一段的时候,逻辑错误会不断的涌现出来,而当我们把有问题的假设以及原论证的逻辑结构清理以后,该论证所存在的所有问题也就都暴露出来了。

在写完开头段并审好题后,大家要趁着头脑清醒,把主要的逻辑问题都打出来

原文可能出现六七个逻辑错误,而大家只需要从中挑出3-4个最主要的进行有利的攻击就可以了。因为这篇文章能不能拿高分,直接取决于与你能否抓住主要逻辑错误。也就是说,如果你忽视了非常致命的逻辑错误,那么即使你把其它的错误批驳得再好,所用的语言再美,字数再多,最后照样不及格。有人担心是不是要把所有的错误都清理出来,实际上大家只要把主要的错误都清理出来,进行有利的攻击,同样可以拿到六分,正如ETS的六分例文一样。这样做的另一个好处是可以节约时间,因为考生在正文写作时往往会把顺手的段落大写特写,力争在某点上把敌人驳的体无完肤,但是等到意识到有其它的重要逻辑错误未被谈及的时候,时间却已经到了。而首先列出提纲则可以提醒我们点到为止,切实做到合理分配时间。与其把一个问题分析的特别透彻,不如把所有的主要问题都涉及到,即使不很透彻,也比前者要好。简而言之,Argument这部分展开批驳的时候,与其“断其一指”,不如“伤其四指”。

在完成了提纲之后,就要逐一展开正文段落了

正文段落的展开有两种的顺序,第一种就是先攻击主要的问题,GMAT写作在第一个段落批驳最重要的逻辑错误,也花最多的笔墨,以后字数和重要性逐级递减。另外一种就是以论证的逻辑关系为序一层一层的批驳。不论何种方式,都应遵循展开文章的一个整体原则,也就是挑你最有话可说的先说。实际上,顺序是可以在检查时通过剪切和复制调整的。

一般情况下都是一段攻击一个主要的逻辑问题。如果逻辑错误很多,那么可以在最后一个正文段集中批判一下,而最后一段中的每个错误点到为止即可。对于除此以外的逻辑错误,我们都应该至少提供一个能批驳原论证的反例或假设。而对于正文段落(除去开头段和结尾段)的数量,没有正确或错误之分,但由于每篇官方 Argument文章都含有2个以上的正文段,我们的文章的正文段数量最好应达到2至4段,全篇最好为4至6段,每个正文段针对一个主要的问题, 每段以4-8句话为宜。句子太少会导致论证不充分,而如果一段超过8句必然有重复的内容,论证效果就会有缺陷,因此每段的句子数量并非越多越好。

GMAT写作  高分作文赏析

  1 开头

In this argument, the arguer concludes/ suggests/ makes a suggestion/ makes a conclusion that…To justify this conclusion/ suggestion/ argument, the arguer points out/ cites that…The arguer also points out/ cites that…Although the argument/ conclusion/ suggestion seems plausible, after closely scrutinizing this argument, I find that this argument is logically flawed in several aspects, which render it unconvincing as it stands.

2 结尾

In conclusion, despite that fact that this argument seems appealing, it has several logical flaws, and is therefore unpersuasive as it stands. To bolster his or her argument, the arguer must provide more information which can show that…To better support this argument, the arguer should also provide…To better evaluate this argument, I would also need to know that…

3 调查问题

A threshold problem with this argument involves a survey/ study/ research itself. The statistical reliability of the survey/study/research/ is really dubious可疑 for the reason that the speaker provide no evidence which can show that the number of the respondents( 这里建议替换成调查研究中的群体。比如针对谁提问就写谁) is statistically significant or that the respondents were representative of the overall group of people(接所有群体,比如北京市所有的一类群体) in general. Common sense tells us that the smaller the size of the sample, the greater the possibility for biased results, the less reliable the result of the survey and the less reliable any general conclusions drawn from the survey. That is to say, (你要开始攻击了) The number of participants, 100(文中数据), might be just an insufficiently small sample on which cannot be justifiably relied to draw any reliable conclusions about… Also, the sample might be not necessarily representative of (所有群体). Lacking the information about the randomness and the size of the survey sample, the speaker cannot convince me to believe in the result of the survey—let alone draw any broader recommendation based on the survey/study/research/ result.

用于结尾总结的句型: To better support this argument, the arguer should provide more information to show that the respondents of the survey are statistically significant in number and can represent the overall …

总结一下,这个是针对原题中出现什么调查研究的专门攻击段,如果你在考试中看到了任何研究调查,立刻把这一段写好。这个攻击段的主题很简单,你的前提,我表示怀疑,而且你没有给我更多的关于你前提的消息,所以,你的结论我也表示怀疑。

更多备考资讯和干货内容,欢迎扫描下方二维码,添加小助手:哆啦A智 进行领取哦!

波士顿学习中心备考小助手

纽约学习中心备考小助手